Top Left Corner
Home icon Home Contact Us icon Contact Us Sitemap icon Sitemap
 
Left Corner Right Corner
Top Right Corner

topleft topright
   
bottomleft bottomright
 
 
They are known to the public as three mild mannered lawyers. But wherever sports analysis and discussion are threatened by tired cliches', superficial bromides, or actual facts, then Tom, Dick and Rand spring into action as their alter egos. The Sports Savants!

Archive for October, 2008

Week 9 NFL Picks - Final

Friday, October 31st, 2008

NFL Picks Game - Week 9 Results Final

November 4, 2008  

Standings after Week 9 - Final
Dick     -120 + 50 = -70
Tom 0 + 30 = 30
Rand   -70 +10= -60
Guest Picker -180 +10 = -170

This week’s picks
Dick: $50 on NYGiants -9, a throwdown against his boys -+ perhaps the easiest pick of the year

Tom: $10 on Philly -6.5 + memo to self, bet against Seattle
         $10 on NE +6 + a cover is a cover is a cover
         $10 on Buffalo -5.5 X not even close
         $10 on Green Bay +5.5 + another cover
         $10 on Arizona -3 + Kurt Warner still the king of StL

Rand: $30 on Pitts +2 Nailed this one - Wash overrated???
         $20 on Tampa Bay -8.5 X survival, but no cover here

This Week’s Guest Prognosticator is none other than Joe Grant of Stewart Title in Dallas fame.  Joe has been closely following the follies of the savants and the guest pickers this year, and it certain he can do no worse.  We have to agree.

Joe:  $20 KC +8.5 + almost had the outright win
         $10 on Dallas +9 - the first 2 picks opposite the savants X and he’s from Dallas, hadn’t he seen Brad Johnson throw?
         $10 on Detriot +13 + betting on the dogs paying off this week
         $10 on Cleveland -1.5 X paying off except for the actual dawgs from Cle

Note: The Sports Savants do not gamble with real money and do not endorse, recommend or promote doing so. The dollar figures above are in “pretend” money, as a way of measuring our success in the game. Not only is gambling illegal in many jurisdictions, it is also pretty dumb. In the end, the house always wins. That’s why the house has gold plated ceilings, dancing girls, magic shows and enormous fountains out front.

BEAT THE SAVANTS

Come to this blog each week to send in your picks for the week. Each week we will feature a guest prognosticator and see how he or she stacks up against the Sports Savants.

Week 8 NFL Picks - Results

Friday, October 24th, 2008

NFL Picks Game - Week 8 Final

October 24th, 2008  

Standings after Week 8 - Swords are Drawn: Dick vs the GP
Dick     -150 +30 = -120
Tom +10 -10 = 0
Rand   -50 -20 = -70
Guest Picker  -130 -50 = -180

This week’s picks
Dick: $10 on Tenn -4 + Super Bowl bound team
         $10 on NYGiants +3 + showed Pitts who is the toughest team
         $10 on Buffalo -1.5 X don’t bet against Big Bill
         $10 on Philly -9 + 2nd Best team NFC East?
         $10 on Wash -7.5 + Late FG covers

Tom: $20 on Jacksonville -7 X Overrated Jack
         $20 on Baltimore -7 + Oakland is Bad
         $10 on San Fran -5 X SF is bad, very bad

Rand: $10 on NE Pats - 7.5 X a win but not a cover
         $10 on Carolina -4 Push, oh well
         $10 on NYJets -13.5 X lucky to beat hapless KC
         $10 on Hou/Cincy over 44.5 X Cincy forgot to participate in the scoring
         $10 on Miami +1.5 + always bet with Big Bill

This Week’s Guest Prognosticator is none other than Mark Nordman, general manager with Troon Golf.  Mark has the TBuc and Gator nations covered.  Not surprisingly, he threw down the gaunlet to Dick to pick the Mightly Cowboys against the TBucs.  Dick refused to take the bait, something about the Cowboys are dead to him, but I had trouble following the entire rant so don’t quote him on that.  Will Mark’s inside information rumored to be directly from an unnamed source who works near the TBucs facility pay off?  We’ll see Sunday.  *Mark did not attend the picks lunch today to face the Savants in person, and worse yet he stopped the streak of the guest picker buying the savants’ lunch at one.

Mark:  $50 on TBuc’s +2.5 X Dick’s cowboys take the bucs down, ugly - but down

Note: The Sports Savants do not gamble with real money and do not endorse, recommend or promote doing so. The dollar figures above are in “pretend” money, as a way of measuring our success in the game. Not only is gambling illegal in many jurisdictions, it is also pretty dumb. In the end, the house always wins. That’s why the house has gold plated ceilings, dancing girls, magic shows and enormous fountains out front.

BEAT THE SAVANTS

Come to this blog each week to send in your picks for the week. Each week we will feature a guest prognosticator and see how he or she stacks up against the Sports Savants.

Week 7 NFL Picks - Results

Friday, October 17th, 2008

NFL Picks Game - WeAk 7 

October 21st, 2008  

Current Standings after Week 7
Dick    -100 - 50 = -150
Tom +20 -10 = +10
Rand  -40 - 10 = -50
Guest Picker -80 - 50 = -130

This week’s picks
Dick: $50 on Tenn/KC under 35 X I believe Dick may have underestimated just how bad the 32nd run defense in the league really is.

Tom: $10 on Pitts -9.5 + solid
         $10 on Houston -9.5 X how could Houston with a 21-0 lead not cover.
         $10 on Chicago -3 + and perhaps the over in this game might have been a good bet also
         $10 on Wash -7.5 X despite Romeo Crennel trying to let Wash cover, they refused, then almost had to go to OT against the lowly Browns     
         $10 on Denver +3 X only missed the push by 31 points - who woke the Pats up anyway

Rand: $10 on San Diego +1 X SD slipping away
         $10 on NYGiants -10.5 + thanks to a late SF safety to give NYG the cover
         $10 on New Orleans +3 X maybe Carolina is good after all, or NO maybe not
         $10 on Green Bay +1 + the in the grill pick against our guest picker pays off
         $10 on Cincy +9.5 X betting on the best 0-7 team in the NFL doesn’t look so good now

This Week’s Guest Prognosticator is none other than Frank Gore.  Frank’s wit and wisdom is known far and wide, and today, we get the benefit of that with his NFL Pick of the Week.  Frank attended the picks lunch today to face the Savants in person.  When confronted with Rand going against his pick, he calmly noted that Rand’s pick was stupid. well maybe stupid was a bit strong in retrospect.

Frank:$50 on Indy -1 X perhaps this would have been a better pick if Peyton hadn’t lead both teams in touchdown passes

Note: The Sports Savants do not gamble with real money and do not endorse, recommend or promote doing so. The dollar figures above are in “pretend” money, as a way of measuring our success in the game. Not only is gambling illegal in many jurisdictions, it is also pretty dumb. In the end, the house always wins. That’s why the house has gold plated ceilings, dancing girls, magic shows and enormous fountains out front.

BEAT THE SAVANTS

Come to this blog each week to send in your picks for the week. Each week we will feature a guest prognosticator and see how he or she stacks up against the Sports Savants.

Week 6 NFL Picks - Results

Thursday, October 9th, 2008

NFL Picks Game - Week 6 - Final 

October 14th, 2008  

Current Standings after Week 6
Dick   -150 + 50 = -100
Tom -10 + 30 = +20
Rand  -30 - 10 = -40
Guest Picker -50 - 30 = -80

This week’s picks
Dick: $50 on Dallas/AZ over 50 + a dumb timeout to ice the kicker allows this one to go to OT and hit the over

Tom: $10 on Carolina +1/5 X - not even close, Carolina is supposed to be good, hmmm
         $10 on New Orleans -7.5 + too easy - why only 10
         $10 on Indy/Balt under 38.5 + I’d like to thank balt for not participating in the scoring
         $10 on Philly -5 + 23 4th quarter points by philly to save this one          
         $10 on Jacksonville +3.5 + capped off a solid week

Rand: $20 on Minnie -13 X NFL considering asking teams to refund admission fees for that stinker
         $10 on NYJ/Cincy over 44.5 X NYJ to the super bowl?
         $10 on Miami +3 + covered in the best game of the weekend
         $10 on Arizona +5 + seems a little easy picking against the cowboys, but a win is a win

This Week’s Guest Prognosticator is the famous Ohioan, Steve Ranney, General Manager of Quail Hollow Country Club (30 miles east of Cleveland).  Steve has already whooped-up on Cassidy on an over/under guess on how many wins the Brownies would have this year - it seems that Cassidy was drinking the Brown kool-aid and Steve wasn’t.  Cassidy overreact - not possible, well maybe possible.  Let’s see how he stacks up against the Savants.

Steve:$20 on Balt +4.5 X this time balt sneaks out of indy
         $10 on NY Giants -7.5 X - the hometown team shows the guest picker up
         $10 on New England +5.5 X this just in, NE not as good without Tom Brady
         $10 on Arizona +5 + in cassidy’s grill pick for the win

Note: The Sports Savants do not gamble with real money and do not endorse, recommend or promote doing so. The dollar figures above are in “pretend” money, as a way of measuring our success in the game. Not only is gambling illegal in many jurisdictions, it is also pretty dumb. In the end, the house always wins. That’s why the house has gold plated ceilings, dancing girls, magic shows and enormous fountains out front.

BEAT THE SAVANTS

Come to this blog each week to send in your picks for the week. Each week we will feature a guest prognosticator and see how he or she stacks up against the Sports Savants.

Fan Misery Index

Tuesday, October 7th, 2008

See? Just like I said, Cubs done in three. That IS what I said, right? Well, it was something like that.

Apparently, while no one was watching the Dodgers put together the best team in the National League. Wow. But with all due credit to LA, what a pathetic effort by the Cubs. Tom was exactly right, it was the lineup that killed them. Soriano hit enough grounders to have succeeded nicely in croquet. Jim Edmonds, whom we said would have to be a key, was 2 for 10 with one RBI. The other lefty batter, Fukudome, was an embarrasment, going 0 for 9 with 5 K’s. Memo to Cubs: if you want to end a 100-year losing streak, don’t curl up in a ball and blow away just because of one grand slam in the 5th inning of the first game.

And so it goes, Cub fans will again have to wait at least one more year. For over 50 years, fans of the Cubs, White Sox and Red Sox all shared a common miserable lot in life, forming the holy triumvirate of baseball suffering. Not so any longer. Both sets of Sox have had their misery washed away this century, winning three of the last four titles between them. But the heartache just keeps piling on for the Cubs.

OK, so if the Cubs are now the unquestioned leaders of inflicting pain on their followers, who’s second? Or third? With the New Englanders and South Siders off somewhere polishing trophies, who is falling in line behind the Cubs for the right to whine, gripe and moan the loudest?

To answer this question, I have created the “Fan Misery Index,” yet another needless attempt to quantify the unquantifiable.

The primary component of the Fan Misery Index is the number of years a team has gone since it’s last world championship (or if none, then since its creation). However, there are two other forms of misery that eat at the baseball fan’s soul: (1) the pain of horrible, hope crushing seasons, where your team is out of the running by memorial day (we’ll call this “Royal Pain,” after the Kansas City team that has the most of these seasons in recent years) and (2) the pain of getting close but coming up short with losses in the playoffs or series (we’ll call this “Brave Pain,” after the Atlanta teams that turned this into an art form in the ’90’s).

The Fan Misery Index assigns additional points for seasons of Royal Pain or Brave Pain since 1961 (and a few bonus points for famous collapses, like the ‘64 Phillies, ‘78 Red Sox, or 2007 Mets). Then we deducted points for titles won since 1961. Why 1961? Well, in part because anything that happened before then is starting to get into the misery of prior generations (though not entirely, for all of our readers). But the main reason is that it standardizes for geographical changes and for the expansion era. For example, I’m not sure how the St. Louis Browns’ three consecutive 100 loss seasons from 1910 to 1912 are really relevant to the misery of a current Baltimore Orioles fan. And fans who lost a team, like those in Brooklyn, were inflicted with a special type of pain that my index could never hope to measure.

Without further adieu, the top five most miserable fans in baseball (with index score):

1. Chicago Cubs, 164. The Gold Standard. 101 years without winning the series, 63 without playing in it. Crushing playoff losses, dreadful 100 loss seasons, stunning collapses, Steve Bartman, cursed billy goats, they’ve had it all. The system doesn’t even give them credit for the seven world series losses between 1910 and 1945 but yes, that happened too. As Tim Kazurinsky said on SNL, “Why does God hate the Cubs?” And that was 25 years ago.

2. Cleveland Indians, 113. The last title for the tribe was in 1948, a team that was led by Bob Feller, Bob Lemon and Lou Boudreau. It was so long ago that Satchel Paige played for that team. Since then, it’s been the perfect storm of long, hopeless stretches mixed together with excruciating near misses–from the team with the best record in history being swept in ‘54, to Jose Mesa blowing it in game 7 in ‘97. And I didn’t even count off for those ridiculous uniforms of the ’70’s, which had to be demoralizing. If the upper Midwest were as filled with poets and writers as New England, the Indians would be the new Red Sox.

3. San Diego Padres, 106. Thirty nine years of existence, no titles, and more 95+ loss seasons than any team in baseball during that time. And unlike Cleveland, they didn’t stop at one set of ugly uniforms, they made at least four different tries at turning a beef chimichanga into an acceptable set of baseball clothes. What separates them from the competition here is that they got their fans hopes up not once but twice, by advancing to the world series–and then barely even showing up, winning exactly one game in 9 tries.

4. Texas Rangers/Washington Senators (the expansion Senators), 105. Ugh. You knew this was coming. If the Rangers ever had ANY postseason success they would rank ahead of the Padres but, frankly folks, fans here have never gotten their hopes up enough to have them be truly crushed. Just one long, hot, miserable endless summer of below average ballplaying.

5. Tie: Houston Astros and San Francisco Giants, 103. Arriving with the Mets in ‘62, the Astros have managed to avoid winning anything despite more than a few good runs at it. Must be something in the water in Texas. The Giants’ last title came in 1954, when Willie Mays was 23 years old, the voters liked Ike, and the only team playing in San Francisco was a minor league team called the Seals. Bonus points for enduring the bittersweet tragedy of a native son  and local fave breaking Aaron’s record under a cloud of taint and controversy. More bonus points for winning 103 games in ‘93 and still  not  making the playoffs.

The highest ranked team still alive in this year’s playoffs is, by far, the Phillies–7th on the overall list with 91 Fan Misery Index points. One title in 120 years of existence, none in the last 28, and a score of awful teams mixed with some near misses has made the Philly fans a sour group. But then, you knew that already, what with the booing Santa Claus and all. If you want to see a fan base get some redemption this year, put on your Phillies cap. Or if you like to see people suffer, then this is the team you are rooting against.

The complete listing follows. For those detail oriented types that want to know my exact methodology, post a comment and I will send it to you.

Cubs            164 
Indians         113
Padres          106
Rangers        105
Astros          103
Giants          103

Phillies           91
Mariners        90
Mets             89
Expos/Nats     87
Brewers         84
Royals           83

Braves          77
Pirates          76
Orioles          64 
Tigers           64
A’s               60
Rays             56

Twins           50
Rockies         50
Reds             49
Blue Jays       49
Dodgers        48
Red Sox        45
Angels          43

White Sox      38
D-Backs        36
Marlins          29
Cardinals       27 
Yankees        24

NFL Picks Game - Week 5 - Results

Thursday, October 2nd, 2008

October 7th, 2008

 

Current Standings after Week 5
Dick -100 - 50 = -150
Tom -20 + 10 = -10
Rand -40 + 10 = -30
Guest Picker 0 - 50 = -50

This week’s picks
Dick: $50 on Dallas minus 17 - X and you’d think he’d learn by now, in the famous words of Tom Landry:  No, Dick No.

Tom: $20 on Denver - 3.5 X, are you sure they only won by 3, I hate 1/2 points
         $10 on New Eng -3 + too easy
         $10 on NY Giants - 7 + why didn’t I put the load on this gimme
         $10 on Indy -3 + sometimes luck is a good thing

Rand: $10 on Chicago - 3.5 + brilliant
         $10 on Hou/Indy over 47 + solid
         $10 on Philadelphia - 5.5 X oops, not so solid
         $10 on Tampa/Den over 48 X you get more scoring at a Rockies game than that one
         $10 on Dal/Cincy over 44 + with the Dallas defense that is money in the bank

This Week’s Guest Prognosticator is none other than Jeff Porter.  Jeff worked with Dick and Tom in an earlier life, and currently practices law in Dallas.  Let’s see how he stacks up against the Savants.

Jeff: $50 on Buffalo +1 X, only missed the push by 23 points - in fairness, with their starting QB instead of their backup they probably could have been within 10 of the mighty Kurt Warner Cardinals.

Note: The Sports Savants do not gamble with real money and do not endorse, recommend or promote doing so. The dollar figures above are in “pretend” money, as a way of measuring our success in the game. Not only is gambling illegal in many jurisdictions, it is also pretty dumb. In the end, the house always wins. That’s why the house has gold plated ceilings, dancing girls, magic shows and enormous fountains out front.

BEAT THE SAVANTS

Come to this blog each week to send in your picks for the week. Each week we will feature a guest prognosticator and see how he or she stacks up against the Sports Savants.


 
 
Copyright © 2008 Henslee & Huguely LLP. All Rights Reserved. Home | Practice | About Us | Services | Sports Savants | Contact Us l Privacy Statement l Legal Notice